40D-80.074: Regulatory Portion of Recovery Strategy for the Southern Water Use Caution Area
PURPOSE AND EFFECT: To adopt rules describing the recovery strategy for minimum flows and levels within the Southern Water Use Caution Area which minimum flows and levels are being developed simultaneously with these rules.
SUMMARY: The proposed rule describes the overall regulatory, and non-regulatory mechanisms the District will use to achieve the recovery required by Section 373.0421, F.S., for minimum flows and levels being established for the Southern Water Use Caution Area pursuant to Section 373.042, F.S., simultaneously with this rule. This proposed rule also describes how recovery will be monitored and the recovery mechanisms adjusted if needed to achieve recovery to the minimum flows and levels by the year 2025.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS: A Statement of Estimated Regulatory Cost, final draft dated March 14, 2006, has been prepared addressing the impact of the proposed minimum flows and levels, and the rules proposed simultaneously in Chapter 40D-2 and 40D-80 to implement the minimum flows and levels within the Southern Water Use Caution Area (the “SWUCA SERC”). The items to be addressed in a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Cost as set forth in Section 120.541(1)(c), F.S., are included in the SWUCA SERC. The SWUCA SERC is available upon request to the District. Any person who wishes to provide information regarding the statement of estimated regulatory costs, or to provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
SPECIFIC AUTHORITY: 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED: 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.171 FS.
IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN FAW.
THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Karen A. Lloyd, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, FL 34604-6899, (352)796-7211, extension 4651.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:
40D-80.074 Regulatory Portion of Recovery Strategy For the Southern Water Use Caution Area.
(1) Background.
Section 373.042, F.S., requires the District to establish Minimum Flows and Levels for priority waters within its boundaries. The District has established Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) within the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA), described in paragraph 40D-2.801(3), F.A.C, which includes all or portions of Hillsborough, Polk, Highlands, Hardee, DeSoto, Manatee, Sarasota, and Charlotte counties. In establishing the MFLs, the District determined that the existing flow rates and water levels of some of the priority waters are below the MFLs established for them. In such circumstances Section 373.0421, F.S., requires the District to implement a recovery strategy. The District has developed a recovery strategy that includes both regulatory and non-regulatory mechanisms as described in the SWUCA Recovery Strategy, dated _____, 2006. The regulatory approach does not make impacts on an MFL water body from permitted quantities existing as of [the effective date of rule] a basis for permit denial because the Recovery Strategy taken as a whole is intended to achieve recovery to the established minimum flows and levels as soon as practicable. The Recovery Strategy involves water supply planning, an emphasis on conservation, the development of alternative water supplies to meet growing demands and allows for reductions in existing ground water withdrawals that are impacting water bodies with established MFLs, restoration of water bodies and flow patterns, and the regulation of existing and new water withdrawals. This Rule 40D-80.074, F.A.C., describes the regulatory approach of the Recovery Strategy.
(2) Objectives of Recovery Strategy.
Long-term (as defined in section 4.3 A of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permits, incorporated by reference in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C.) flow rates and water levels for most MFL water bodies are below the MFLs predominantly because ground water withdrawals have lowered Floridan aquifer levels in the SWUCA. As a result of the lowered aquifer levels, salt water intrusion is occurring, and river flows and lake levels are impacted by reduced water levels, including some of those rivers and lakes for which MFLs have been established. The goals of the District's Recovery Strategy are the recovery of flows and levels to the MFLs and the provision of sufficient water supplies for all existing and projected reasonable-beneficial uses. The MFLs for rivers, lakes and aquifers are described in and established in paragraph 40D-8.041(2), F.A.C., and Table 8-5 in Rule 40D-8.624, F.A.C., and Table 8-2 and Rule 40D-8.626, F.A.C., Table 8-6. The District intends to maintain on its website at www.swfwmd.state.fl.us a current listing of those water bodies for which a recovery or prevention strategy is in effect.
(3) Recovery Strategy Mechanisms.
(a) The non-regulatory mechanisms include conservation and water resource development efforts intended to increase the availability of alternative water supplies and to enhance the water resources of the SWUCA. Conservation, transitions in land use from agricultural to other use or changes in supply source, and the availability of alternative water supplies will help meet growing water demands in the SWUCA, and will also allow for reductions in ground water withdrawals.
(b) The guiding principles for the regulatory portion of the Recovery Strategy are that it should:
1. Contribute significantly to resource management and recovery;
2. Protect the investments of existing water use permit holders; and,
3. Allow for economic expansion and new economic activities in the SWUCA.
In addition, the District recognizes that the water resources in the SWUCA are subject to varying degrees of stress. The regulatory component of the Recovery Strategy has been designed in recognition of these variations. How water use permit applications will be affected by the regulatory mechanisms will vary depending on the resource conditions in the area affected by a proposed withdrawal and the extent to which the withdrawals will contribute to these resource conditions. For example, the regulatory mechanisms continue the existing “Most Impacted Area” (MIA) designation in coastal portions of southern Hillsborough, Manatee and northern
(c) The water use permitting rules in Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C., address water conservation, alternative water supplies and recovery to MFLs. These water conservation and alternative water supplies rules include the amendments to Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C., ________, 1990, January 1, 2003, as well as subsequent rules adopted as of ______, 2006, developed in conjunction with the implementation of the Minimum Flows and Levels Recovery Strategy. In combination, these rules result in more efficient use of water and a lessening of impacts from withdrawals on water bodies with established MFLs.
(4) Restoration of river flows and lake levels.
In addition to the reduction of pumpage and permitted quantities, and the development of new water supplies, the supplemental augmentation of rivers and lakes that are below their established Minimum Flow or Level will contribute to the attainment of the objectives of the Recovery Strategy set forth in paragraph 40D-80.074(2), F.A.C.
The District will reserve quantities of water from water sources necessary for such augmentation.
(5) Periodic Review of Recovery Strategy.
(a) The Governing Board will measure progress based on an annual assessment of the water resource criteria and cumulative impact analysis described below.
1. Improving upper Peace River flows and
b. Maintaining or increasing ground water levels below the upper Peace River and in the Ridge Lakes area; and
c. Increasing ground water levels in the Upper Floridian aquifer within the Most Impacted Area and the reduction in the rate of salt water intrusion.
2. The cumulative impact analysis referred to above consists of the following:
a. The development of alternative water supplies;
b. The effects of water conservation;
c. The hydrologic conditions and patterns;
d. The effects of climatic conditions;
e. The effects of water resource development activities;
f. The changes in amounts, distributions and use types of existing and new water use withdrawals (actual and permitted) within the SWUCA; and
g. The effect of land use changes on the water resources.
(b) Results of the annual assessment referred to above will be reported to the Governing Board on an annual basis.
(c) In addition to the annual assessments referred to the District will review the Recovery Strategy at least every five years to assess its progress as part of updating its Regional Water Supply Plan. If the annual assessments or five-year reviews do not indicate progress, the Governing Board will revise the Recovery Strategy, as appropriate, to achieve progress.
(6) The provisions of paragraphs 40D-80.074(1)-(4), F.A.C., are informational, intended to provide an overview of resource conditions related to the water bodies for which minimum flows and levels have been established and the components of the Recovery Strategy. The provisions of the SWUCA minimum flows and levels and permitting rules in Chapters 40D-2, 40D-4 and 40D-80, F.A.C., shall control in the event of any conflict or inconsistency with the provisions of paragraphs 40D-80.074(1)-(4), F.A.C.
(7) The District recognizes that although the rate of salt water intrusion (SWI) will be reduced through implementation of the Recovery Strategy, some existing legal uses of water may be affected by the continued movement of the salt water interface. The District's water supply planning indicates that much of the area potentially susceptible to SWI is experiencing land use transition from traditionally agricultural lands to forms of urban development. The water needs of these new land uses are planned to be met with alternative water supplies funded all or in part by the District to the greatest extent practical. In those cases where the existing permittee, impacted by SWI, desires to continue the existing legal water use, the District has a number of programs that address that situation. The District will make available its various preventative and remedial programs to permittees potentially at risk of salt water intrusion such as the Quality of Water Improvement Program (QWIP), the Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) program, the New Water Source Initiative, the Water Supply and Resource Development Program, and the Cooperative Funding Program (as it relates to replacement of potentially affected water sources with alternative water supplies).
Specific Authority: 373.044, 373.113, 373.171, F.S. Law Implemented: 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.171, F.S. History–New ________, 2006.