61J2-3.016: Video Tape Quality Standards
PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The rule repeal eliminates the obligations of the Commission to evaluate the quality of picture and audio components of videotaped courses.
SUMMARY: This rule is being repealed.
SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS: No Statement of Estimated Regulatory Cost was prepared.
Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
SPECIFIC AUTHORITY: 475.04, 475.05, 474.17, 475.451 FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED: 475.04, 475.17, 475.451 FS.
IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN FAW.
THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Lori Crawford, Deputy Clerk, Division of Real Estate, 400 West Robinson Street, Hurston Building, North Tower, Suite N802, Orlando, Florida 32801
THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:
61J2-3.016 Video Tape Quality Standards.
(1) In addition to Commission evaluation of the video tape course content noted in Rule 61J2-3.008, F.A.C., the Commission will also evaluate overall quality of the video tape program and its resultant display on the classroom monitor receiver. Programs or lessons produced and displayed for individual or group instruction must maintain standards such that the clarity and stability of the video tape, the monitor/receiver display, and the quality of the sound and viewing conditions do not interfere with the learning process. All students within the “viewing footprint” noted in Rule 61J2-3.017, F.A.C., must be able to clearly see and hear the entire video taped course instruction. The following general criteria will be used for evaluating video taped productions.
(2) Picture clarity. Although color is preferred, the program (lesson) may be recorded in black and white but it must be suitable for a compatible color system. It must have adequate picture definition (resolution) to avoid visual fatigue of the viewer and not interfere with the learning process. Factors which will be considered in evaluating a video tape program for picture clarity include brightness, contrast, definition, distortion, interference, focus, noise, resolution, smear, snow and streaking.
(3) Picture stability. Factors which will be considered in evaluating a video tape program for picture stability include interface, jitter, video level, modulation, picture signal, random interlace, raster, roll synchronization and tearing.
(4) Audio quality. Factors which will be considered in evaluating the audio (sound) portion of a program include crosstalk, fidelity, level and modulation.
Specific Authority 475.04, 475.05, 474.17, 475.451 FS. Law Implemented 475.04, 475.17, 475.451 FS. History–New 8-24-80, Formerly 21V-3.16, 21V-3.016, Repealed________.