Notice is hereby given that the following changes have been made to the proposed rule in accordance with subparagraph 120.54(3)(d)1., F.S., published in Vol. 35 No. 24, June 19, 2009 issue of the Florida Administrative Weekly.

APPLICANT’S HANDBOOK SECTIONS

12.2.7. Secondary Impacts

(b) 1. No change.

2. wildlife corridors, except for those limited areas of uplands necessary for ingress and egress to the nest or den site from the wetland or other surface water.

Table 12.2.7-1 identifies those aquatic or wetland dependent listed species that use upland habitats for nesting and denning.

For those aquatic or wetland dependent listed animal species for which habitat management guidelines have been developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) compliance with these guidelines will provide reasonable assurance that the proposed system will not adversely impact upland habitat functions described in paragraph (b). For those aquatic or wetland dependent listed animal species for which habitat management guidelines have not been developed or in cases where an applicant does not propose to use USFWS or FWC habitat management guidelines, the applicant may propose measures to mitigate adverse impacts to upland habitat functions described in paragraph (b) provided to aquatic or wetland dependent listed animal species.

Secondary impacts to the functions of wetlands or uplands for nesting of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) will not be considered adverse if the applicant holds a valid permit ~~has been issued to the applicant~~ pursuant to subsection 68A-16.002(1)(a), F.A.C. (May 15, 2008) or a valid authorization as described in subsection 68A-16.002(1)(c), F.A.C. (May 15, 2008) for the same activities proposed by the applicant under part IV of Chapter 373, F.S., or if the applicant demonstrates compliance with the FWC Eagle Management Guidelines incorporated by reference in Rule 68A-16.002, F.A.C. (May 15, 2008).