FAR Issue Vol. 41/No. 116 | Section II | |
Issue Date: June 16, 2015 | ||
Total number of notices in Section II: 10 |
Notice / Adopted |
Description | ID | Publish Date |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Amending rule to include those sections of repealed Chapter 20-1, F.A.C. that meet Chapter 120, F.S., requirements and are not repetitive language. | 16113851 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
Complete rewrite codifying in rule the processes used to collect data and disseminate reports of processing statistics. | 16111426 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
Official Forms Used by Agency: Incorporating updated forms for Processor Statistics reporting based on amendment to 20-3; Revenue 4R form; Citrus Fruit Dealer Application. | 16111620 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
This rule outlined the requirements for citrus fruit dealer license applications and bonds, including bond exempt fruit; defined complete grove management; it also outlined the requirements for registration of Dealer's Agents, .... | 16111523 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
The Board proposes to substantially rewrite Chapter 61G15-23, F.A.C., by reordering the content of Rule 61G15-23.001,F.A.C., to 61G15-23.002,F.A.C.; reordering the content of Rule 61G15-23.002, F.A.C., to 61G15-23.001, F.A.C.; .... | 16109486 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
The proposed rule amendment is intended to set forth a citation violation to address the failure of a designated physician in a pain management clinic to submit required data. | 16109389 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
The proposed rule amendment is intended to remove the requirement that the notification to the Department of the licensee’s mailing address and place of practice be made by mail. | 16109292 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
The proposed rule amendment to Rule 64B15-12.003 is intended to remove language in the rule which is no longer necessary. The proposed repeal of 64B15-12.004 is necessary since the rule is unnecessary. | 16109195 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
The proposed amendment to Rule 64B15-10.0055 is intended to clarify the rule with regard to renewal fees for residents, interns and fellows. The proposed repeal of Rule 64B15-10.0075 is necessary since the rule is no longer .... | 16109001 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |
||
The proposed rule amendments are intended to remove language which is unnecessary in the rule. | 16108807 |
6/16/2015 Vol. 41/116 |